![]() |
|
Trout lilies, Trillium and
Mayapples
in the woods at Chicago Botanic Garden;
Photo courtesy of Kay Havens
|
I had the pleasure of walking through the Mary Mix McDonald Woods at Chicago
Botanic Garden this week to enjoy the amazing display of spring
wildflowers. This year, it sure felt
like spring was a long time coming. Especially compared to last year when it came remarkably early. I wondered how the spring wildflower timing
compared to previous several years in the Chicago area. Thanks to Project BudBurst, I’m able to
easily look back at my phenological observations and those of others in the
region.
For instance, I’ve been tracking when the first Forsythia flower opens at
Chicago Botanic Garden since 2007. The
earliest bloom was last year on March 15, 2012; the latest first flower was
this year on April 20, 2013. However in
2007 and 2008 we also had first flowers in mid-April (4/16/07 and 4/17/08), so
as we look back in time, this year’s bloom time doesn’t feel quite so late. In the graph below we show the variation in
flowering dates, using Julian dates which standardize for differences in dates between
non-leap and leap years.
In the Chicago area, we have a wealth of phenology data collected by the
authors of our local flora, Plants of the
Chicago Region by Swink and Wilhelm (1994). While they were gathering data for their book, they recorded when they
saw plants in bloom from the late 1950s to the early 1990s. For instance, for Forsythia, they record its
bloom period as April 25-May 5. So when
we look a little further back in time, even this spring which seemed so late,
is earlier than it has been in the past.
I took a similar look at several other species, both native and
non-native, for which we have both Project BudBurst data and data from Swink
and Wilhelm’s book.
About 70% of the species
have earlier flowering dates in the last 6 years compared to those recorded by
Swink and Wilhelm. I show some of the
species that have advanced their flowering dates in the table below.
Species
|
Earliest First Flower Observations
|
||
Common name (Genus species)
|
Swink & Wilhelm 1950s-1990s
|
Project BudBurst
2007-2012
|
Days Advanced
|
Forsythia (Forsythia
x intermedia)
|
April 25
|
March 15
|
-40
|
Spiderwort (Tradescantia
ohiensis)
|
May 14
|
April 12
|
-32
|
Dogtooth violet
(Erythronium americanum)
|
April 6
|
March 20
|
-17
|
Red Maple (Acer
rubrum)
|
March 20
|
March 6
|
-14
|
Mayapple (Podophyllum
peltatum)
|
May 1
|
April 17
|
-13
|
Lilac (Syringa
vulgaris)
|
May 3
|
March 20
|
-44
|
Black locust (Robinia
pseudoacacia)
|
May 9
|
April 20
|
-19
|
Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana)
|
April 15
|
April 13
|
-2
|
Plant
phenology, particularly when plants leaf out and bloom in the spring, is
remarkably sensitive to the annual weather. Looking at phenological records over much longer periods of time can
tell us a lot about how the climate is changing. Many scientists are comparing contemporary
bloom times with historic bloom times recorded by naturalists like Aldo Leopold
in the early 1900s and Henry David Thoreau in the mid-1800s, as well as records
kept by farmers, gardeners and others interested in the natural world. Two of the longest phenological data sets are
those maintained about cherry blossoms in Japan (dating back to 900 AD) and grape
harvest dates by wine makers in Switzerland (dating back to 1480 AD). Plants have so much to tell us, if we take
the time to listen!
Contributed by Dr. Kay Havens
Contributed by Dr. Kay Havens


